Manage Pressing Risks with

A one-stop hub for practical, timely and actionable insights, tools and training that may save thousands of dollars by minimizing potential loss exposures, human resources expenses, training costs, and attorney fees.

Stay on top of current workplace issues, legislation, and employment trends with:
  • Articles, News Briefs, and Checklists
  • Interactive Training Modules
  • Model Handbook with 100+ Template HR Policies, Procedures, and forms

Today's Workplace

New NIST Guidance: How Does It Help Against Cybercriminals?

There are several cybersecurity measures your organization can take to prevent a ransomware attack or to recover from one.

Continue Reading

CAPTCHA Turns To GOTCHA: How Online Criminals Are Upping Their Phishing Game To Incorporate Fake Security Credentials

Read about a scheme increasingly used to deceive users, and keep your employees informed.

Continue Reading

Limited Access Is The Centerpiece Of All Data Security Strategies

Employers must revoke account access when employees leave. Read about how continued access creates exposure.

Continue Reading

Investment Offerings: Another Settlement Creates More Questions

Citigroup Inc. has reached a $6.9 million settlement with plaintiffs in a ten-year-old lawsuit, in which plaintiffs alleged the financial services firm included within its retirement plan expensive in-house investments, thereby enriching the company at the expense of its employees.

The lawsuit, Leber v. Citigroup Inc. et al., was originally filed in October 2007 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Plaintiffs claimed the company breached its fiduciary duty by including high cost, underperforming investment products managed by Citigroup subsidiaries and affiliates, which included Smith Barney and Salomon Brothers, in the Citigroup 401(k) plan.

Parties filed for approval by the judge of the proposed settlement in August. Citigroup declined to comment.

The eligible class of plaintiffs in the class action lawsuit includes participants in the Citigroup 401(k) plan who invested in one of nine in-house funds between Oct. 18, 2001, and Dec. 1, 2005. The Citigroup plan has roughly $12 billion in assets and more than 144,000 participants, according to BrightScope Inc. "Citigroup reaches $6.9 million settlement in 401(k) lawsuit" (Aug. 06, 2020).


Many asset managers, primarily those focused on the active management of their investments, have been sued in recent years based on self-dealing allegations because they included proprietary funds in their 401(k) plans.

The Citigroup settlement is another in a line of other financial services firms that have settled in these cases. In 2017 and 2018, for example, American Airlines settled similar claims against it for $22 million; Allianz for $12 million; TIAA for five million dollars; and New York Life for three million dollars. Other suits, including those against Wells Fargo & Co., Capital Group, and Putnam Investments, were dismissed.

The question of whether a plan fiduciary breaches its ERISA-mandated duty of the fiduciary duty of prudence by including underperforming, or more expensive investment options is often litigated. Many class action plaintiffs have successfully shown that the inclusion of more expensive or underperforming investments was a breach of that duty.

Other courts have dismissed those claims, finding that because of the variety of options available to them, plaintiffs could avoid the high fees simply by choosing a less expensive option because they were not forced to choose higher or poor performing investments.

Recently, the United States Supreme Court has agreed to address the question of: "Whether allegations that a defined-contribution retirement plan paid or charged its participants fees that substantially exceeded fees for alternative available investment products or services are sufficient to state a claim against plan fiduciaries for breach of the duty of prudence under ERISA 29 USC sec. 1104(a)(1)(B").

A decision is expected in 2022.


Finally, your opinion is important to us. Please complete the opinion survey: